Differences between revisions 15 and 18 (spanning 3 versions)
Revision 15 as of 2021-01-21 15:16:51
Size: 4436
Editor: PJJung
Comment:
Revision 18 as of 2021-01-22 11:44:00
Size: 5593
Editor: PJJung
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
= CAGMon etude = {{{
 ,-----. ,---. ,----. ,--. ,--. ,--. ,--.
' .--./ / O \ ' .-./ | `.' | ,---. ,--,--, ,---. ,-' '-.,--.,--. ,-| | ,---.
| | | .-. || | .---.| |'.'| || .-. || \ | .-. :'-. .-'| || |' .-. || .-. :
' '--'\| | | |' '--' || | | |' '-' '| || | \ --. | | ' '' '\ `-' |\ --.
 `-----'`--' `--' `------' `--' `--' `---' `--''--' `----' `--' `----' `---' `----'
}}}

Line 49: Line 57:
==== Flow chart ====

Line 53: Line 64:
TBA [[TBA]]
Line 84: Line 95:
==== User guide ====
 * [[How to use CAGMon]]

==== Needs of code development ====
 * Daily running on KAGRA

Line 96: Line 114:
2. Skim through all obs-segments of O3GK
 * Purpose
  * Test for calculation time and required resources with all observation segments during O3GK
  * To figure out trigger events or abnormal behaviors
 * Results

Line 104: Line 129:
[[https://science.sciencemag.org/content/334/6062/1518 | Science.1518; Detecting Novel Associations in Large Data Sets]]

 ,-----.  ,---.   ,----.   ,--.   ,--.                            ,--.             ,--.        
'  .--./ /  O  \ '  .-./   |   `.'   | ,---. ,--,--,      ,---. ,-'  '-.,--.,--. ,-|  | ,---.  
|  |    |  .-.  ||  | .---.|  |'.'|  || .-. ||      \    | .-. :'-.  .-'|  ||  |' .-. || .-. : 
'  '--'\|  | |  |'  '--'  ||  |   |  |' '-' '|  ||  |    \   --.  |  |  '  ''  '\ `-' |\   --. 
 `-----'`--' `--' `------' `--'   `--' `---' `--''--'     `----'  `--'   `----'  `---'  `----'                                                                                             

Description

The CAGMon etude is a study version of CAGMon that evaluates the dependence between the primary and auxiliary channels.

Project goal

The goal of this project is to find a systematic way of identifying the abnormal glitches in the gravitational-wave data using various methods of correlation analysis. Usually, the community such as LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA uses a conventional way of finding glitches in auxiliary channels of the detector - Klein-Welle, Omicron, Ordered Veto Lists, etc. However, some different ways can be possible to find and monitor them in a (quasi-) realtime. Also, the method can point out which channel is responsible for the found glitch. In this project, we study its possible to apply three different correlation methods - maximal information coefficient, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and Kendall's tau coefficient - in the gravitational wave data from the KAGRA detector.

Participants

  • John.J Oh (NIMS)
  • Young-Min Kim (UNIST)
  • Pil-Jong Jung (NIMS)

Methods and Frameworks

Maximal Information Coefficient (MIC)

the Maximal Information coefficient(MIC) of a set D of two-variable data with sample size n and grid less than B(n) is given by

\[ MIC(D)=\underset{xy<B(n)}{\max}{\left\{ \frac{I^{*}(D,x,y)}{\log \min \left\{x,y \right\}} \right \}} \],

where \[\omega(1)<B(n)\le O(n^{1-\epsilon}) \] for some \[ 0<\epsilon<1 \]

Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (PCC)

Pearson Correlation Coefficient(PCC) is a statistic that explains the amount of variance accounted for in the relationship between two (or more) variables by \[ R=\sum_{i=1}^{n} (X_i - \overline{X})(Y_i - \overline{Y})} \over {\sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^{n} (X_i - \overline{X}) \sum_{i=1}^{n} (Y_i - \overline{Y})} \],

where \[ \overline{X} \] and \[ \overline{Y} \] are the mean of X and Y, respectively

Kendall's tau Coefficient

Kendall’s tau with a random samples n of observations from two variables measures the strength of the relationship between two ordinal level variables by

\[ \tau =\frac{c-d}n \choose 2 \],

where c is the number of concordant pairs, and d is the number of discordant pairs

Flow chart

Code development

GitHub

TBA

Code version

  1. CAGMon Etude Alpha
    • for the basic test and evaluation of the LASSO regression method developed by LIGO
    • reproduced original CAGMon methods and idea
  2. CAGMon Etude Beta
    • added coefficient trend plots with LASSO beta, coherence, MIC, PCC, and Kendall's tau
  3. CAGMon Etude Delta
    • fixed a critical problem that sucked enormous memory when it used the matplotlib module
  4. CAGMon Etude Eta
    • fixed memory issues
    • fixed minor bugs
    • added the range limitation of stride
  5. CAGMon Etude Flat (latest version)
    • fixed minor issues and optimized scripts
    • added the script of HTML summary page
    • added coefficient distribution plots

Structure of scripts

  • Agrement.py
    • the script gathered functions the medel required
  • Melody.py
    • the script to calcutate each coefficient and to save trend data as csv
  • Conchord.py
    • the script to make plots, such as coefficient trend, coefficient distribution trend, time-series, and scatter plots
  • Echo.py
    • the script to save the result as HTML web page
  • CAGMonEtudeFlat.py
    • the script to run each script

User guide

Needs of code development

  • Daily running on KAGRA

Exemplary results

1. Earthquake effects during O3GK

2. Skim through all obs-segments of O3GK

  • Purpose
    • Test for calculation time and required resources with all observation segments during O3GK
    • To figure out trigger events or abnormal behaviors
  • Results

Beyond

References

Presentation materials

JGW-G2112481-v1

Papers

Science.1518; Detecting Novel Associations in Large Data Sets

PJJung/CAGMonEtude (last edited 2021-07-28 08:43:57 by PJJung)