Differences between revisions 2 and 7 (spanning 5 versions)
Revision 2 as of 2012-08-23 13:27:03
Size: 949
Editor: YoichiAso
Comment:
Revision 7 as of 2018-01-18 15:52:23
Size: 1476
Editor: YoichiAso
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
## page was renamed from InstrumentControl/Others
Line 2: Line 3:
There are remote controlled target plates deployed along the arms of the interferometer. The controller of each plate accept a TTL signal to move the plate up and down. There are 8? targets in one arm, thus totalling 16? targets to be controlled.
Line 4: Line 6:
The interferometer provides interlock signals to shut down the laser in case of, for example, some optics swinging too large or mis-aligned too much. The trigger conditions are programmed into the realtime system (thus out of the scope of instrument control). The generated trigger signal will be sent to the instrument control system via TTL lines. The physical connectors for the trigger signals will be provided at three places, the central area and the two end stations. At each of the three locations, all the various trigger signals/conditions are aggregated to a single TTL line. Therefore, the instrument control system should expect to receive one TTL line per location for the trigger from the interferometer.
Line 5: Line 8:
||<tablewidth="200px"#ffff99>Subsystem ||<#ffff99>Name ||<#ffff99>Model ||<#ffff99>Interface ||<#ffff99>Location ||<#ffff99>Quantity ||<#ffff99>Priority ||
||Vac ||Gate Valve || || || ||7 ||Mid ||
||VIS ||Suspension Watchdog || ||Analog Voltage, Relay Switches ||Every suspension ||11 ||High ||
||Cryo ||Temp. Monitor || ||RS-232C ||Every Cryostat ||8 ||Low ||
||Laser ||LD Current Monitor ||Analog Voltage || || ||4 ||High ||
||IOO-AOS ||Shutter || || ||Dark Port ||1 ||Mid ||
||VIS-AOS ||Earthquake alert(?) by Optical Lever || || ||Every SASed Mirror ||14 ||Mid ||
||VIS-AOS ||Range Over alert in Optical Lever on Obs. mode || || ||Every SASed Mirror ||14 ||Mid ||
||VAC-AOS ||Automatic Target Control Signal in Arm Tubes || || ||Every target ||greater than 8? ||Mid ||
|| || || || || || || ||
|| || || || || || || ||

== Interlock Signal from Facsility ==
== Interlock Signal from Facility ==
The facility subsystem may emit interlock signals to the laser for various reasons. The most probable scenario is that an unauthorized person entering the KAGRA site triggers a warning from the access control system. We expect to have a few (less than 10) TTL lines sent from the facility to the instrument control system for this purposes.

Target plate control

There are remote controlled target plates deployed along the arms of the interferometer. The controller of each plate accept a TTL signal to move the plate up and down. There are 8? targets in one arm, thus totalling 16? targets to be controlled.

Interlock Signal from Interferometer

The interferometer provides interlock signals to shut down the laser in case of, for example, some optics swinging too large or mis-aligned too much. The trigger conditions are programmed into the realtime system (thus out of the scope of instrument control). The generated trigger signal will be sent to the instrument control system via TTL lines. The physical connectors for the trigger signals will be provided at three places, the central area and the two end stations. At each of the three locations, all the various trigger signals/conditions are aggregated to a single TTL line. Therefore, the instrument control system should expect to receive one TTL line per location for the trigger from the interferometer.

Interlock Signal from Facility

The facility subsystem may emit interlock signals to the laser for various reasons. The most probable scenario is that an unauthorized person entering the KAGRA site triggers a warning from the access control system. We expect to have a few (less than 10) TTL lines sent from the facility to the instrument control system for this purposes.

PLC/Others (last edited 2018-01-18 15:52:23 by YoichiAso)