Differences between revisions 14 and 15
Revision 14 as of 2019-07-12 17:34:15
Size: 6523
Comment:
Revision 15 as of 2019-07-12 17:35:22
Size: 6555
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
||<tablewidth="786px">Channel Name||Rate||Fotmat||Description||

||<tablewidth="786px">K1:CAL-CS_PROC_MICH_RESIDUAL_DBL_DQ ||16384 ||F64LE ||MICH error ||
||<tablewidth="786px">'''Channel Name<<BR>>'''||'''Rate<<BR>>'''||'''Format<<BR>>'''||'''Description<<BR>>'''||
||K1:CAL-CS_PROC_MICH_RESIDUAL_DBL_DQ ||16384 ||F64LE ||MICH error ||
Line 14: Line 13:
||GRD-LSC_LOCK_STATE_N ||16||F32LE||LSC lock state|| ||GRD-LSC_LOCK_STATE_N ||16 ||F32LE ||LSC lock state ||
Line 16: Line 15:
||GRD-IO_STATE_N ||16||F32LE||IMC state (optional)|| ||GRD-IO_STATE_N ||16 ||F32LE ||IMC state (optional) ||

Low-latency and offline

Channels used for low-latency and offline calibration (July 12 - ...)

Channel Name

Rate

Format

Description

K1:CAL-CS_PROC_MICH_RESIDUAL_DBL_DQ

16384

F64LE

MICH error

K1:CAL-CS_PROC_MICH_DELTA_CTRL_TM_DBL_DQ

4096

F64LE

MICH TM stage control

K1:CAL-CS_PROC_MICH_DELTA_CTRL_IM_DBL_DQ

4096

F64LE

MICH IM stage control

K1:CAL-CS_PROC_MICH_DISPLACEMENT_DQ

16384

F32LE

MICH displacement (optional)

K1:CAL-CS_PROC_IMC_RESIDUAL_DQ

16384

F32LE

IMC error

K1:CAL-CS_PROC_IMC_DELTA_CTRL_AOM_DQ

4096

F32LE

IMC AOM frequency control

K1:CAL-CS_PROC_IMC_DELTA_CTRL_TM_DQ

4096

F32LE

IMC TM stage control

K1:CAL-CS_PROC_IMC_FREQUENCY_DQ

16384

F32LE

Laser frequency (optional)

GRD-LSC_LOCK_OK

16

F32LE

LSC Guardian OK status

GRD-LSC_LOCK_STATE_N

16

F32LE

LSC lock state

GRD-IO_OK

16

F32LE

IMC Guardian OK status

GRD-IO_STATE_N

16

F32LE

IMC state (optional)

where F32LE and F64LE means: floating-point 32-bit and 64-bit numbers in Little-Endian format.

Low-latency h(t) reconstruction server (Aug - Oct/31: DT,SH,TY,NK,...)

  • We already have three computing nodes to test the offline h(t) reconstruction via frame file but we need to install another for the low-latency h(t) reconstruction via shared memory inside the tunnel

  • (Aug/20-) Connection and software test between a prototype PC and a test bench
    • Prototype PC is just a standard desktop PC and will be prepared by SH
  • (Aug-Sep) Procurement of server (2U height, at least two 10G network card, standard CPU,memory and disk)
    • According to Darkhan’s test with LIGO data and discussion with LIGO people, standard spec should be OK.
    • DT is working to figure out the spec and model.
    • Academia Sinica will make the procurement
  • (Mid.Sep) Connection test between the server and the test bench
    • We also need the collaboration with DMG people for the data transfer
  • (Sep-Oct) Connection test between the server and the KAGRA online system
    • We also need the collaboration with DMG people for the data transfer

Current tasks (May 26 - July 15):

  • Ask to LIGO CAL team for the detailed information of gstlal-calibration (DT) [status: ongoing | expected finish: N/A]

  • Make gstlal-calibration running on a machine at KAGRA (DT, SH) [status: ongoing | expected finish: Jul 15]

    • Find names and versions of all prerequisite libraries
    • Install prerequisites and gstlal-cal package on a machine at AS
    • Test gstlal-cal pipeline on an AS machine
    • Install prerequisites and gstlal-cal package on a machine at KAGRA
    • Test the pipeline on a KAGRA machine

Progress so far (June 21):

  • Ask LIGO CAL team for the detailed information of gstlal-calibration
    • (ongoing) gstlal-calibration maintainers in LIGO are helping to resolve some installation and testing issues.

  • Find names and versions of all prerequisite libraries,
  • Install required packages and the gstlal-cal package on a machine at AS
  • Test gstlal-cal pipeline on an AS machine
    • As a prerequisite to this task, DT reproduced a portion of LIGO h(t) from raw data with gstlal-calibration-v1.1.8 (w/ a "docker-gstlal-cold" image). This test was done on a private server (2-cores on Intel Xeon 2.4GHz, 8GB RAM).

    • Downloaded a few hours of bKAGRA Phase-1 data on AS machine.

    • (doing) Will try to reproduce C00 with gstlal-calibration. Details in

    • (to do) Verify the output of gstlal-calibration.

  • Install prerequisites and gstlal-cal package on a machine at KAGRA
  • Test the pipeline on a KAGRA machine gstlal tests

    • to do

  • Documentation

Progress so far (June 7):

  • Ask LIGO CAL team for the detailed information of gstlal-calibration
    • Communication with people working on LIGO gstlal has been initiated.

  • Find names and versions of all prerequisite libraries,
  • Install prerequisites and gstlal-cal package on a machine at AS
    • As a prerequisite to this task, SH worked on installation process for CentOS, DT for Debian.

    • The goal is to have a better understanding of what is happening under the hood when the gstlal-calibration package is compiled.

  • Test gstlal-cal pipeline on an AS machine
    • As a prerequisite to this task, DT is currently trying to reproduce LIGO h(t) from raw data.

    • A sub-goal of this task is to come up with a gstlal code testing procedure.

    • DT addressed some questions to LIGO gstlal people.

  • Install prerequisites and gstlal-cal package on a machine at KAGRA
  • Test the pipeline on a KAGRA machine gstlal tests

    • to do

New tasks:

  • Put more effort on documentation.

KAGRA/Subgroups/CAL/Low-latency_and_offline (last edited 2020-07-25 03:17:08 by darkhan.tuyenbayev)