Differences between revisions 12 and 16 (spanning 4 versions)
Revision 12 as of 2016-08-05 09:49:39
Size: 2525
Comment:
Revision 16 as of 2016-10-20 13:45:50
Size: 3536
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 20: Line 20:

Line 43: Line 45:
 * KC made the new algorithm without arc tangent. JGP will check with real data. KK will check if it can be done in the CDS system or not.  * KC made the new algorithm without arc tangent. JGP will check the formulas with real data. KK will check if it can be done in the CDS system or not.
Line 47: Line 49:

== 10/6 skype telecon ==

 * Target is Physical Letter A.
 * To check the calibration again with the peak areas and higher harmonics taken into account.
 * To check the drift data with the calibration factor.
 * To check if the oplev noise went down or not after we took the tiltsensor out.
 * For paper, KK and SK will write the intro part, and JGP will write the resulting part.
 * Email to Kanda-san (KSC) about the open data

=== paper contents ===
 * we could calibrate oplev using the tilt sensor
 * They agreed ok
 * Tiltsensor's dynamic range was much larger than oplevs
 * environmental perturbation to be improved


== 10/20 Local metting (KK & SJ) ==
 * We do not understand the calibration factors (or the spectrum magnitudes) change between tilt sensors and oplevs
 * We will re-center the MCE oplev on Monday
 * An excitation peak will be inserted on MCE and see if the peak height change in time
 * We will have another local meeting on Wednesday morning.

Meeting

Note_First_Meeting

7/1 Skype Telecon

  • KC and JGP will consider closer for the optical configuration (please upload new info)
  • KK will check if we have all necessary components
  • KK, KC and JGP will discuss about the disital software in Seoul
  • SK and KK will meet in Kamioka for a preparation (8/10)
  • We'll have another skype meeting before the site work

7/8 in Sogang University

  • JGP will prepare the drawing of the configuration (on the pylon optical table)
  • JGP will prepare the required circuits (signal amps).
  • For the online data taking and analysis, we will need a digital model and MEDM screens. JGP will prepare the initial concept of the digital software.
  • With the prepared concept, we will build the model and make MEDM screens during KC/JGP visit (~1day).
  • We noticed that the digital software cannot do arc tangent. We will consider to use an approximation.
  • As planned, KK and SK will collect the necessary hardware on 8/10 (DC power supply, 50m cable, cable adaptors, AA filter)
  • KK will let JGP know about the Dsub 9 pin assignment to connect to an AA filter.

8/2 Skype Telecon

Preparation

  • JGP will get the drawing in a few days.
  • All the parts will arrive today. KC and JGP will carry them (no shipping).
  • JGP will assemble and test the circuits this week. Reports will be made next week.
  • Model and MEDM screens will be prepared with Kirii-kun on 8/10 as well as the first phase of the visit.
  • KC will think about the approximation formula of art tangent to use in the digital model.
  • SJ will submit the "tunnel entrance form" for the experiment.
  • KK will send the Dsub pin assignment today.
  • KK will find AA filter soon.

Other note

  • No IR laser beam during the experiment.
  • We have to check again about the safety lecture.

Next meeting

  • Next meeting will be 8/5 9:20 am. KK will call everyone on skype.

8/4 Skype telecon

  • The parts arrived; some mechanical parts were found wrong; JGP have fixed them; JGP will assemble today.
  • The drawing of the optical table (python table) will be done today by JGP.
  • Test result of the setup will be emailed.
  • KC made the new algorithm without arc tangent. JGP will check the formulas with real data. KK will check if it can be done in the CDS system or not.
  • Check the safety rule.
  • SJ will submit the mine entrance form.
  • JGP will carry the clumps (which is to fix the sensor on the table).

10/6 skype telecon

  • Target is Physical Letter A.
  • To check the calibration again with the peak areas and higher harmonics taken into account.
  • To check the drift data with the calibration factor.
  • To check if the oplev noise went down or not after we took the tiltsensor out.
  • For paper, KK and SK will write the intro part, and JGP will write the resulting part.
  • Email to Kanda-san (KSC) about the open data

paper contents

  • we could calibrate oplev using the tilt sensor
  • They agreed ok
  • Tiltsensor's dynamic range was much larger than oplevs
  • environmental perturbation to be improved

10/20 Local metting (KK & SJ)

  • We do not understand the calibration factors (or the spectrum magnitudes) change between tilt sensors and oplevs
  • We will re-center the MCE oplev on Monday
  • An excitation peak will be inserted on MCE and see if the peak height change in time
  • We will have another local meeting on Wednesday morning.

KAGRA/Subgroups/IOO/TiltSensor/Meeting (last edited 2017-06-13 15:32:24 by KeikoKokeyama)