Size: 6430
Comment:
|
Size: 6804
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 48: | Line 48: |
* NoEMI | * NoEMi |
Line 50: | Line 50: |
* Visitors from LV | * Visitors from LVK |
Line 55: | Line 55: |
* Fujikawa, TNTanaka 11/24-12/3 | |
Line 73: | Line 74: |
* 週末のFPMIとPEMのcoherenceを見ていった。 * 11HzのEXCにmagとの相関が見えたのですが、みに行った時間にはなかった、lockとの関係がある? * Pcal RxPD 1.3HzはETMYのgasが励起していて、それが影響していた可能性がある。->long oplevとして見えた。 * 24Hzはrack noise |
* Calculated the coherence between DARM displacement and PEM channels for long locked data (>1h, 500average) * We can see the coherence between DARM and EXC MAG Y at 11Hz, but we couldn't see peak when he went to end station, coincidence with LOCK status? * Coherence with PCal RxPD at 1.3Hz, ETMY gas excitation made the large oscillation, Pcal detected as long oplev * 24Hz is serious rack noise |
Line 79: | Line 80: |
* 60Hz EXC magが大きい、GNDが汚れている可能性が高い * PSL acousticは複数micを置いて場所を見る。 * ~110Hzはlaser amp |
* The 60Hz peak of the EXC MAG is larger than other MAG, this imply the dark GND at Xend station * It turned out acoustic noise search inside the PSL is difficult, we prepared the multiple microphone and see the data at the same time. * laser amp made the ~110Hz vibration and injected to the noise, similar path with 24V power supply vibration(white rack) |
Line 83: | Line 84: |
* Priorityを決める、Identifyとhuntingはちがう。 | * We need to classify the Priority to the noises, it is different between identification and hunting |
Line 88: | Line 89: |
* 42Hzパイロンの共振 * 44Hz 気まぐれcompressor |
* 42Hz is resonant frequency of the pylon * 44Hz Whimsical compressor -> checked by them |
Line 91: | Line 92: |
* 54.125Hz きまぐれcompressor * 58音? * acoustic injectionで盛り上がるpeakがある。散乱光の影響か? * IXCとDARMのcoherenceを取れるdataが木曜日の夜にすこしだけある。 * center areaのmicとDARMに7Hz coherence、エンドには出ない * ITMX MN Pとcoherence <20Hz * TM oplev定盤に置いたACCとDARMにcoherenceがある、46Hz、いいヒント * MICとITMX PEMのcoherence、46Hzにmic vs TM oplev、lengthにあるかも * プシュー有り無しで比較したい。 * compressor, 2分静か、30秒かたかた、10分、プシュー |
* 54.125Hz Whimsical compressor -> checked by them * 58 sound origin? * Some peaks were grow up by the acoustic injection, due to the scattered light? * There is data which can take coherence between DARM and accelerometers which were placed in the IXC chamber * There is some coherence between DARM and MIC at center area, there is no coherence with end mic * There is coherence with ITMX MN P <20Hz * There is coherence at 46Hz between DARM and ACC at the TM oplev table, this is some hint for 46Hz noise * Also MIC at 46Hz * We want to check the condition with various air compressor |
Minute of PEM meeting (English)
- Date: 2019/11/05 17:00-18:00(JST)
- Attend:Yokozaqwa, TNTanaka, Fujikawa, Ohkawa, Washimi, Mori, Kozakai, Yamada, Akutsu, Kaihotsu
Agenda
- General issue
- PTEP paper
- [kagra 03133]
- KAGRA Overview papers
- Overview of KAGRA : (3) Detchar, calibration, physical environment, data quality
- Next F2F meeting
- RESCEU
- 4th and 5th Dec., 2019
- 1 slot Washimi-san will have a talk
- If you plan to write master/doctor thesis, please let me know
- Master thesis : TTanaka(ICRR)
- Chrome Book project (Portable PEM researcher)
http://gwwiki.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/JGWwiki/KAGRA/Subgroups/PEM/Portable
- We prepared two PEM Chromebook
- Start writing paper (PTEP?)
- PEM injection
- Shaker injection1 (TTanaka, Yokozawa)
Shaker injection2 (Okutomi, Fabian) -> After O3
- acoustic injection (TTanaka, Yokozawa)
- magnetic field injection (Niigata Tanaka, Fujikawa, Yokozawa)
RF injection (TTanaka, Washimi) -> After O3
- Weekly PEM measurement
- Friday is weekly PEM measurement
- Understanding the effect of the instruments, search the origin of noise, and so on
- Tentative : New vacuum pump, 18V DC noise(24Hz), Cryochamber vibration(46Hz), FFU, Noise search
- Database for the KAGRA characteristic lines
- NoEMi
- Visitors from LVK
- Anamaria from Livingston : 18 - 29 Nov.
- Federico, Irene, Camilla (input optics) + Francesca from Virgo : 11/18-12/7 (2 weeks@KAGRA, 1 weeks@NAOJ)
- We will ask them about the status talk of the commissioning break and reviewer
- Fujikawa, TNTanaka 11/24-12/3
- Each progress
- Yokozawa
- Current serious noises
- 24Hz noise (100V AC + AA?)
- We connect/disconnect the GND JP in the AA chassis, but could not understand
- MICH control noise
- Add the noise projection of the MICH control noise
- Coherent with ITMX MN YAW
- Wait for the noise budget of the Type-A control
- Coherence with ITMY TM PIT
- Wait for the noise budget of the Type-A control
- 24Hz noise (100V AC + AA?)
- Daily summary page
- Update PEM, VIS, FPMI part
- Current serious noises
- Washimi
- Summary of coherence study between PEMs and DARM displacement
Calculated the coherence between DARM displacement and PEM channels for long locked data (>1h, 500average)
- We can see the coherence between DARM and EXC MAG Y at 11Hz, but we couldn't see peak when he went to end station, coincidence with LOCK status?
- Coherence with PCal RxPD at 1.3Hz, ETMY gas excitation made the large oscillation, Pcal detected as long oplev
- 24Hz is serious rack noise
- 44,45Hz Compressor or FFU?
Compressor sound make44Hz, 46Hz and 56Hz -> stop during observation, check the coherence with FPMI signal
- The 60Hz peak of the EXC MAG is larger than other MAG, this imply the dark GND at Xend station
- It turned out acoustic noise search inside the PSL is difficult, we prepared the multiple microphone and see the data at the same time.
- laser amp made the ~110Hz vibration and injected to the noise, similar path with 24V power supply vibration(white rack)
- 840Hz IMC refl
- We need to classify the Priority to the noises, it is different between identification and hunting
- Summary of coherence study between PEMs and DARM displacement
- Washimi, Yamada, TTanaka
IXC vibration -> See the Yamada-san's slide
- Identify the origin of the frequency noise
- 42Hz is resonant frequency of the pylon
44Hz Whimsical compressor -> checked by them
- 46.125Hz
54.125Hz Whimsical compressor -> checked by them
- 58 sound origin?
- Some peaks were grow up by the acoustic injection, due to the scattered light?
- There is data which can take coherence between DARM and accelerometers which were placed in the IXC chamber
- There is some coherence between DARM and MIC at center area, there is no coherence with end mic
There is coherence with ITMX MN P <20Hz
- There is coherence at 46Hz between DARM and ACC at the TM oplev table, this is some hint for 46Hz noise
- Also MIC at 46Hz
- We want to check the condition with various air compressor
- Kozakai
- Trigger analysis with silent run
- glitch plotがautoで走ったので、Yuzu summary pageを見てみてください。
- glitch plot catalog
- 磁束計で見えているのと地震計で見えているものがある、何処のsuspensionが影響が大きいかなどもわかると思う。
Fabianがコメントしていた、oplev jumpは影響あるか?->あとでみてみる
- TTanaka(ICRR), Washimi, TTanaka(Niigata), Yamada
- Acoustic injection with FPMI
- Mori, Nakayama
- Vacuum pump vibration
- 6箇所のvacuum pump(dry、turbo)を止めた、ionは止めていない、観測中もionだけは着けておくと思われる。
- turbo pump on/offでの振動の比較
- Pressureは2倍になったが、影響はなさそう、outor gasは少ないと思われる。
- 振動が少ないポンプ
- ポンプ由来の振動ピークと音響ピークを同定できた
- 200Hzがfloorがすこしちがう、OFFの方が多いから何かhintになると思う。214と216Hz。253Hzはonoff関係なく存在した。
- chiller付きのpumpではない
- Fujikawa, Mori
fujimopy PEMmtg_191105fmpy.pdf
- 装置オンオフのpeak identification
- diagguiからもできるようにした。
ICRR accountが来たのでhtmlを開始する。40Hz->11Hzか?
- Line amplitude web page
- Fujikawa, Washimi
- Lock loss study
root histogram-> gauss fitting and check the significance->lock lossの原因を簡単に判明?
acoustic injectionのlock loss->pulse的なのか、振動が強くなって行ったのか?
- FPMIのロックロス
- Lock loss study
- TTanaka(Niigata)
- Preparation of the coil
- 24Hz noise situation
- PEM injection用コイルドライバーの作成
- 卒論の議論とMAG injection
- etc
- Yokozawa