Differences between revisions 2 and 13 (spanning 11 versions)
Revision 2 as of 2020-09-10 09:50:38
Size: 1942
Comment:
Revision 13 as of 2020-09-11 09:27:04
Size: 4649
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 2: Line 2:
2020/9/11 14:00 -  2020/9/11 14:00 -
Line 6: Line 6:
Participants:  Participants:
Line 11: Line 11:
Line 12: Line 13:
=== Type-B === === Type B ===
Report for the week of the 7th of September 2020.

 * I finished the corrections of the Type-B paper. Mark is checking the final vesion and I will submit as soon as he is finished.
 * Miyo-kun, Ikeda-san and I went to the mine and did ballast mass inventory ([[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14998|14998]]):
  * Fabian is in the process of checking roghly how much we will need.
  * We checked for rectangular ones for the top of IM, round ones for the top of BF and arch weights for IPs.
  * Pictures and the actual inventory are in a new album in Google Photos: [[https://photos.app.goo.gl/X2eaBxsZGaRHYAQK6|SR3 Remedying work after O3]].
  * Pictures of the top of SR3 IM: [[https://photos.app.goo.gl/4XPFZhT1i8yNoTSQ9|IM_top_1]], [[https://photos.app.goo.gl/zCaGhGh3521xT9cw7|IM_top_2]], [[https://photos.app.goo.gl/KphJBYRTfdi65Szf7|IM_top_3]], [[https://photos.app.goo.gl/WQvYbXj3a7iXhPtq8|IM_top_4]], [[https://photos.app.goo.gl/JP95jUx5yVMh7uyF6|IM_top_5]], [[https://photos.app.goo.gl/Mm9vypUDD3oASgiV7|IM_top_6]]. We will likely need to replace thick ones by thinner ones with the same weight and then remove from opposite corners.
 * In the procedure document I wrote that we must measure the bouyancy displacement effect when we to the venting. '''Importanrt for the adjustment of the ballast masses in BS and SR3'''.
  * Before we did the pumping down with the contro on, so we only know the change in feedback signal. (I should use TF vales to calcilaye displacement.)
  * We should do it with the control off just to measure the displacement directly.
 * For SR3 and SRM I measured the resonant frequencies of IPs (klog [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=15013|15013]]).
  * SRM IP looks fine.
  * SR3 IP requires adjustment, the resonant frequencies are relatively high and there's a large assymetry between L and T. We have very small arch weights to fix the assymetry. '''What's the TAMS300 experience?'''
 * I tried to assess the consequence of having ferromagnetic connectors close to magnets on top of SF (klog [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=15011|15011]]): inconclusive results.
 * I haven't checked Sato-san's cable alternative proposal.
Line 14: Line 32:
 * Checked the payload prototype in TAMA for the wire gluing.
  * The gap between TM and RM is large enough to insert a stick with adhesive, but it was difficult to see the wire on TM.
  * In actual case, we can see the wire through the mirror.
 
Line 17: Line 39:
Line 26: Line 47:
 * Schedule of the preparation work.  * Preparation work.
  * The preparation work will be started on Oct. 1st.
  * [[https://www.dropbox.com/s/fxeig8e8aicjnc4/Booth%20cleaning.pdf?dl=0|Schedule and assignment of personnel]]
Line 28: Line 51:
  * Example of the form like "Inspection document".
 * Schedule towards O4 ([[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11475|Chart]]).
  * [[https://www.dropbox.com/s/6bv15yy6hg0wn40/Acceptance%20Test%20Documentation.docx?dl=0|Example of the form in inspection document style]].
 * Schedule towards O4.
  *
[[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11475|Two cases]].

Agenda/Minutes of the VIS Meeting on 2020/9/11

2020/9/11 14:00 -

Zoom Meeting

Participants:

Progress report

General

  • The VIS-CRY integration meeting will be set at 13:30-14:00 weekly just before the VIS meeting.

Type-A

Type B

Report for the week of the 7th of September 2020.

  • I finished the corrections of the Type-B paper. Mark is checking the final vesion and I will submit as soon as he is finished.
  • Miyo-kun, Ikeda-san and I went to the mine and did ballast mass inventory (14998):

    • Fabian is in the process of checking roghly how much we will need.
    • We checked for rectangular ones for the top of IM, round ones for the top of BF and arch weights for IPs.
    • Pictures and the actual inventory are in a new album in Google Photos: SR3 Remedying work after O3.

    • Pictures of the top of SR3 IM: IM_top_1, IM_top_2, IM_top_3, IM_top_4, IM_top_5, IM_top_6. We will likely need to replace thick ones by thinner ones with the same weight and then remove from opposite corners.

  • In the procedure document I wrote that we must measure the bouyancy displacement effect when we to the venting. Importanrt for the adjustment of the ballast masses in BS and SR3.

    • Before we did the pumping down with the contro on, so we only know the change in feedback signal. (I should use TF vales to calcilaye displacement.)
    • We should do it with the control off just to measure the displacement directly.
  • For SR3 and SRM I measured the resonant frequencies of IPs (klog 15013).

    • SRM IP looks fine.
    • SR3 IP requires adjustment, the resonant frequencies are relatively high and there's a large assymetry between L and T. We have very small arch weights to fix the assymetry. What's the TAMS300 experience?

  • I tried to assess the consequence of having ferromagnetic connectors close to magnets on top of SF (klog 15011): inconclusive results.

  • I haven't checked Sato-san's cable alternative proposal.

Type-Bp

  • Checked the payload prototype in TAMA for the wire gluing.
    • The gap between TM and RM is large enough to insert a stick with adhesive, but it was difficult to see the wire on TM.
    • In actual case, we can see the wire through the mirror.

Type-C

Controls

Electronics

Towards O4

cf. Post Obs. task (Request), Task for O3c (Plan, Sheet), Task towards O4 (List)

Safety

Discussion

Travel Plans

Next meeting

  • On 2020/9/18(Fri)

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/VISMinutes20200911 (last edited 2020-09-11 16:10:55 by RyutaroTakahashi)