Size: 2097
Comment:
|
Size: 4405
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 2: | Line 2: |
2020/9/11 14:00 - | 2020/9/11 14:00 - |
Line 6: | Line 6: |
Participants: | Participants: |
Line 11: | Line 11: |
Line 13: | Line 14: |
=== Type B === Report for the week of the 7th of September 2020. * I finished the corrections of the Type-B paper. Mark is checking the final vesion and I will submit as soon as he is finished. * Miyo-kun, Ikeda-san and I went to the mine and did ballast mass inventory ([[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14998|14998]]): * Fabian is in the process of checking roghly how much we will need. * We checked for rectangular ones for the top of IM, round ones for the top of BF and arch weights for IPs. * Pictures and the actual inventory are in a new album in Google Photos: [[https://photos.app.goo.gl/X2eaBxsZGaRHYAQK6|SR3 Remedying work after O3]]. * Pictures of the top of SR3 IM: [[https://photos.app.goo.gl/4XPFZhT1i8yNoTSQ9|IM_top_1]], [[https://photos.app.goo.gl/zCaGhGh3521xT9cw7|IM_top_2]], [[https://photos.app.goo.gl/KphJBYRTfdi65Szf7|IM_top_3]], [[https://photos.app.goo.gl/WQvYbXj3a7iXhPtq8|IM_top_4]], [[https://photos.app.goo.gl/JP95jUx5yVMh7uyF6|IM_top_5]], [[https://photos.app.goo.gl/Mm9vypUDD3oASgiV7|IM_top_6]]. We will likely need to replace thick ones by thinner ones with the same weight and then remove from opposite corners. * In the procedure document I wrote that we must measure the bouyancy displacement effect when we to the venting. '''Importanrt for the adjustment of the ballast masses in BS and SR3'''. * Before we did the pumping down with the contro on, so we only know the change in feedback signal. (I should use TF vales to calcilaye displacement.) * We should do it with the control off just to measure the displacement directly. * For SR3 and SRM I measured the resonant frequencies of IPs (klog [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=15013|15013]]). * SRM IP looks fine. * SR3 IP requires adjustment, the resonant frequencies are relatively high and there's a large assymetry between L and T. We have very small arch weights to fix the assymetry. '''What's the TAMS300 experience?''' * I tried to assess the consequence of having ferromagnetic connectors close to magnets on top of SF (klog [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=15011|15011]]): inconclusive results. * I haven't checked Sato-san's cable alternative proposal. |
|
Line 17: | Line 36: |
Line 30: | Line 48: |
* Example of the form in inspection document style. | * [[https://www.dropbox.com/s/z8geo0vmix4snwt/Acceptance%20Test%20Documentation.pdf?dl=0|Example of the form in inspection document style]]. |
Agenda/Minutes of the VIS Meeting on 2020/9/11
2020/9/11 14:00 -
Participants:
Progress report
General
- The VIS-CRY integration meeting will be set at 13:30-14:00 weekly just before the VIS meeting.
Type-A
Type-B
Type B
Report for the week of the 7th of September 2020.
- I finished the corrections of the Type-B paper. Mark is checking the final vesion and I will submit as soon as he is finished.
Miyo-kun, Ikeda-san and I went to the mine and did ballast mass inventory (14998):
- Fabian is in the process of checking roghly how much we will need.
- We checked for rectangular ones for the top of IM, round ones for the top of BF and arch weights for IPs.
Pictures and the actual inventory are in a new album in Google Photos: SR3 Remedying work after O3.
Pictures of the top of SR3 IM: IM_top_1, IM_top_2, IM_top_3, IM_top_4, IM_top_5, IM_top_6. We will likely need to replace thick ones by thinner ones with the same weight and then remove from opposite corners.
In the procedure document I wrote that we must measure the bouyancy displacement effect when we to the venting. Importanrt for the adjustment of the ballast masses in BS and SR3.
- Before we did the pumping down with the contro on, so we only know the change in feedback signal. (I should use TF vales to calcilaye displacement.)
- We should do it with the control off just to measure the displacement directly.
For SR3 and SRM I measured the resonant frequencies of IPs (klog 15013).
- SRM IP looks fine.
SR3 IP requires adjustment, the resonant frequencies are relatively high and there's a large assymetry between L and T. We have very small arch weights to fix the assymetry. What's the TAMS300 experience?
I tried to assess the consequence of having ferromagnetic connectors close to magnets on top of SF (klog 15011): inconclusive results.
- I haven't checked Sato-san's cable alternative proposal.
Type-Bp
Type-C
Controls
Electronics
Towards O4
- KAGRA is in "RSE Trial" now.
- Procedure documents.
- Preparation work.
- The preparation work will be started on Oct. 1st.
Acceptance Test (Wiki page).
Schedule towards O4 (Chart).
cf. Post Obs. task (Request), Task for O3c (Plan, Sheet), Task towards O4 (List)
Safety
Discussion
Travel Plans
Next meeting
- On 2020/9/18(Fri)