Differences between revisions 54 and 55
Revision 54 as of 2021-02-20 09:35:45
Size: 8364
Comment:
Revision 55 as of 2021-02-20 09:37:17
Size: 8449
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 120: Line 120:
=== Electronics (Tanaka-san) === === Electronics (Tanaka) ===
 * New combiner circuit was delivered to Kamioka. It should be evaluated at the site.

Agenda/Minutes on 2021/2/19

Zoom Meeting

CRY+VIS Interface Meeting

13:30-14:10

Participants: Takahashi, Miyo, Aso, Sato, Hirata, Ikeda, Ushiba, Tomaru

Post O3 Upgrade portal

  • Schedule for IX: Released on 2/18. BF was overload.
  • Schedule for IY: Disconnection is scheduled on 3/11.
  • Schedule for EX: Connection is scheduled in the week of 3/15.
  • Corrugate tube fixing jig: Re-measurement is planed in 2/26-3/1 at IYV.
  • Commissioning in air: Commissioning of IX will be started. Other schedule has not been decided yet.
  • Commissioning in vacuum:
  • Acceptance check: Cryo-payload in IX/EX and Type-A tower in EY/IX are on going.
  • PF actuator: Not evaluated in IX, but after the commissioning for suspension.
  • Jig for FC painting: Assembling.
  • Overall commissioning: To be considered about personnel.

VIS Meeting

14:00-15:00

Participants: Takahashi, Miyo, Aso, Sato, Hirata, Ikeda, Ishizaki, Sugiyama, Terrence, Fabian, Tanaka

Progress report

Schedule

vis_gant+0219

JGW-L2011475-v26

General

General

Summary:

  • [Ikeda] Investigation of the cable length for network cable and temperature control in center are was done. Investigation for both end station was not. [1,2]
  • [Miyo] Automation script to make the foton files was made[3]. In this week I reproduce the OSEMINF foton file for all Type-Bp suspension by suing the script. This script will help us to avoid human error.

klog:

  1. 15737 We investigated the network connection. , satoru.ikeda

    • 16028 Comment, satoru.ikeda

  2. 16036 Cabling for temperature control equipment , satoru.ikeda

  3. 16038 Initialize the OSEMINF filters for all Type-Bp suspensions , kouseki.miyo

    • 16040 Comment, kouseki.miyo

Type-C

MCF Summary:

  • 16041 Recovery of IMC suspension , ryutaro.takahashi

    • 16049 Comment, naohisa.satou

  • 16041 Recovery of IMC suspension , ryutaro.takahashi

Type-A

EY Summary:

  • 15993 Setup of F2 , ryutaro.takahashi

    • 16023 Comment, ryutaro.takahashi

    • 16034 Comment , ryutaro.takahashi

    • 16050 Comment , ryutaro.takahashi

IX Summary:

  • (!) 16055 Setup of BF with the released cryo-payload , ryutaro.takahashi

Type-Bp

PR2

Summary: [Miyo] I connected the cables for PRM minirack because these had been disconnected from Fujimi-sangyo clean work.

  • (!) 16054 PR2 minirack is moved to 2nd floor , kouseki.miyo

PR3 Summary:

Type-Bp

  • After the release of the jammed picomotor, Ikeda-san moved back the sliding mass but he was unable to recover the same orientation of the IM according to the OSEMs. Pitch and were ended up with different values.
  • The transfer functions showed an unhealthy system.
  • Before doing visual inspection of the IM I moved IM-Y to zero from 1.78 mrad. However, while opening the chamber (cloth covers) it moved to about -500 urad. Moreover, during subsequent work it went to -2.3 mrad and it's been stable there.
  • A few OSEM flags seem to be touching the OSEM bodies. Their positions are consistent with the large amount of yaw measured.
  • About cables:
    • Cables from the IM touch cables from the IM. (Lilkely not good but not too bad.)
    • Cables from the IRM touch cables from the IRM. (Lilkely not good but not too bad.)
    • A cable from the BF is touching the BF Damper.
    • A cable from the BF Damper is touching the security structure before it's clamping point on the security structure.
    • We provided more slack to those cables by improvising a additional clamping point on the securuty structure. This might have improved the situation of H1 OSEM flag but it did not solve the overall problem.
    • There are some cables which are dangerously close to touching other cables.
  • Today we assesed again the position of the OSEM flags.
  • What do do?
    • Maybe we should move the BF picomotor again.
    • Adjust the tilt of BF by putting temporary ballast masses (in places yet to be decided) to see if the IM is released.
    • Move OSEM panels?
  • 15889 Traverser motor test and cabling. , fabian.arellano

    • 16027 Comment, satoru.ikeda

  • 15976 Picomotor of PR3_BF_T(Motor2) got stuck , satoru.ikeda

    • 16024 Comment, fabian.arellano

    • 16026 Comment , satoru.ikeda

    • 16032 Comment , fabian.arellano

    • 16043 Comment , fabian.arellano

    • 16052 Comment , fabian.arellano

    • (!) 16056 Comment , fabian.arellano

PRM Summary:

  • 16048 Operation check of Picomotor of PRM IM and BF , satoru.ikeda

Type-B

SR3 Summary:

  • 15963 IM ballast mass adjustment , fabian.arellano

    • 16009 Comment, fabian.arellano

  • 16007 Ballast mass adjustment on top of BF , fabian.arellano

    • 16018 Comment, fabian.arellano

    • 16035 Comment , fabian.arellano

Electronics (Tanaka)

  • New combiner circuit was delivered to Kamioka. It should be evaluated at the site.

Control (Miyo)

Towards O4

Safety

Discussion

  • When will we do the recovering work for type-Bp suspensions?

  • Cabling style of the thermistors is reviewed by SEO?

Travel Plans

The week from 2/22

  • Takahashi: 2/23-2/28
  • Sato: 2/23-26
  • Hirata: 2/23-26
  • Yano: 2/23-26

The week from 3/1

  • Takahashi: 3/1-5
  • Sato: 3/1-5
  • Hirata: 3/1-5
  • Yano: 3/1-5

Next meeting

  • On 2020/2/26(Fri)

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/VISMinutes20210219 (last edited 2021-02-20 09:40:40 by RyutaroTakahashi)