Size: 565
Comment:
|
Size: 6023
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 2: | Line 2: |
Participants: | Participants: Satoshi Tanioka, Kenta Tanaka, Naoki Koyama, Chiaki Hirose, Kentaro Somiya, Kiwamu Izumi, Koji Nagano, Marc Eisenmann, Masayuki Nakano, Naoki Aritomi, Shoichi Oshino, Tomotada Akutsu, Yua Michimura |
Line 14: | Line 14: |
* Interferometer alignment [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=12594|JGW-T2112594]] (Michimura) * For O4, ISS setup will be removed from IMMT1T table but IMMT1 oplev setup will remain. * We should take care if it affect IMMT1T QPD signals. * Dan Chen made some scripts to give the position of the beam in Tcam. * We might be able to use this to center the beam on ITMs and ETMs automatically. * The reason why we used BS in PRMI alignment instead of ITMY is because BS had more drift than ITMY. * In the OMC alignment actually, OSTM was used instead of OMMT1. * Kenta confirmed this by checking the guardian script. * TRX IR QPDs were actually investigated to see where the pitch-yaw coupling in the QPD signals comes from, but the issue was not solved * '''A/I''' Check klog [Akutsu] * What do we do for the beam positioning on SRM? * In aLIGO, there was a QPD to monitor SRM transmission * In KAGRA, we might be able to use OMMT1 transmission * In KAGRA, we don't have an OFI before OMMT1, so we might suffer from back scattering * '''A/I''' Investigate if we can put a QPD (or two QPDs) * We can always use A2L for the beam positioning. * SRM HR camera should be there, but may be it is not useful especially after mid-Baffle installation * What can we do for the automation? * Use Tcam beam positioning script instead of using our eyeballs * Replace POP POM and POS POM with PZT mirrors instead of picomotors * The gouy phase separation between POP POM and PR3 (POS POM and SR3) is small. We might want to use PZT mirrors on POP/POS table. * Remember that POP POM and POS POM are put on a in-vac suspended table * Putting oplevs to POP POM and POS POM might be tough considering space available * Beam positions on PR2, PRM, IMMT2 are not controlled * BPC might not be useful in PRMI since signals are covered by frequency noise * Put cameras? * In aLIGO, beam position on PRM did not affected the sensitivity much * Gouy phase separation between IMMTs and PRs * In Xarm IR alignment, IMMT2 and PR2 were used, but IMMT2 was often skipped. This seemed to be from the degeneracy, but Gouy phase separation between two is ~19 deg, which seems to be enough. * Baffle PDs * They are not used any more, but it is always good to have extra sensors. * IMMT1 and OMMT1 were not used for the alignment. ITMY and SR3 was also not often used. * Fiber noise cancellation improvement plans for ALS [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=12769|JGW-T2112769]] (Tanioka) * The end mirror for the reference path drifts too much * Will be replaced * Resonant peaks of PZT limits the control bandwidth * PZT actuation range is small for long-term stability * Use woofer and tweeter configuration * 45 deg incidence on PZT mirror gives coupling to alignment * Use AOM instead (in long term upgrade) * 0 deg incidence and put waist on the mirror * Change in the optical layout necessary * Use PBS to minimize the change in the optical layout? * Report from the site * IMC ASC simulation work started * Layout modifications of IMC optical tables started |
|
Line 19: | Line 65: |
* Other recent topics | * Are we going to remove ISS setup at IMMT1T? * Any upgrades necessary for IMC ASC? * Can we automate the beam centering with Tcams for reproducibility? * Any thoughts on why PRMI alignment has to be done before Yarm alignment? * Are there better ways for daily alignment? * What are the steps necessary for engaging WFS/QPD loops in O4? * Other recent topics related to ISC * Fiber noise cancellation improvement plans for ALS [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=12769|JGW-T2112769]] (Tanioka) * Non-polarized beam splitter https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=10506 [Michimura] * IMC REFL: Thorlabs BSW11 are used (Ts=~40%) * IMC TRANS: Probably Thorlabs BSW11 are used * REFL: Note that p-pol is coming out from the chamber. Newport 10Q20HBS.33S (for s-pol) are used. Thin film polarizers are also used and there seems to be a confusion. * POP: Newport 10Q20HBS.33S (for s-pol) is used. S-pol/P-pol power ratio can be confused with this BS. * POS: No BS placed. * AS: p-pol is coming out from the chamber. We agreed to use HWP to make them s-pol and to use Newport 10Q20HBS.33S (for s-pol). But this solution might be confusing. * Planning to order non-polarized BS soon. * In-vac steering mirrors: https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=12592 [Michimura] * For some steering mirrors, p-pol beam * STM1, STM2, POM1, POM2 around IFI (PYD-20 is used) * steering mirrors after OFI * PYD-20 has a transmission * T < 70ppm at 0 deg for s-pol (measured) * T < 25ppm at 30 deg for s-pol (measured) * T < 5ppm at 45 deg for s-pol (measured) * T ~ 1000pppm at 45 deg for p-pol (specsheet) * Also, specs of POP_POM and POS_POM for IR p-pol needs to be investigated * Optical table cover for TRX/TRY and IMC REFL/IMC TRANS: [[KAGRA/subgroup/ifo/MIF/Minutes20210412|Review page]] [Michimura] |
ISC Meeting on 2020/04/13 13:00 - 15:00
Participants: Satoshi Tanioka, Kenta Tanaka, Naoki Koyama, Chiaki Hirose, Kentaro Somiya, Kiwamu Izumi, Koji Nagano, Marc Eisenmann, Masayuki Nakano, Naoki Aritomi, Shoichi Oshino, Tomotada Akutsu, Yua Michimura
Zoom meeting: https://zoom.us/j/6676627462
Your time zone: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20210413T0400
Next meeting
TBD
Minutes
Interferometer alignment JGW-T2112594 (Michimura)
- For O4, ISS setup will be removed from IMMT1T table but IMMT1 oplev setup will remain.
- We should take care if it affect IMMT1T QPD signals.
- Dan Chen made some scripts to give the position of the beam in Tcam.
- We might be able to use this to center the beam on ITMs and ETMs automatically.
- The reason why we used BS in PRMI alignment instead of ITMY is because BS had more drift than ITMY.
- In the OMC alignment actually, OSTM was used instead of OMMT1.
- Kenta confirmed this by checking the guardian script.
- TRX IR QPDs were actually investigated to see where the pitch-yaw coupling in the QPD signals comes from, but the issue was not solved
A/I Check klog [Akutsu]
- What do we do for the beam positioning on SRM?
- In aLIGO, there was a QPD to monitor SRM transmission
- In KAGRA, we might be able to use OMMT1 transmission
- In KAGRA, we don't have an OFI before OMMT1, so we might suffer from back scattering
A/I Investigate if we can put a QPD (or two QPDs)
- We can always use A2L for the beam positioning.
- SRM HR camera should be there, but may be it is not useful especially after mid-Baffle installation
- What can we do for the automation?
- Use Tcam beam positioning script instead of using our eyeballs
- Replace POP POM and POS POM with PZT mirrors instead of picomotors
- The gouy phase separation between POP POM and PR3 (POS POM and SR3) is small. We might want to use PZT mirrors on POP/POS table.
- Remember that POP POM and POS POM are put on a in-vac suspended table
- Putting oplevs to POP POM and POS POM might be tough considering space available
- Beam positions on PR2, PRM, IMMT2 are not controlled
- BPC might not be useful in PRMI since signals are covered by frequency noise
- Put cameras?
- In aLIGO, beam position on PRM did not affected the sensitivity much
- Gouy phase separation between IMMTs and PRs
- In Xarm IR alignment, IMMT2 and PR2 were used, but IMMT2 was often skipped. This seemed to be from the degeneracy, but Gouy phase separation between two is ~19 deg, which seems to be enough.
- Baffle PDs
- They are not used any more, but it is always good to have extra sensors.
- IMMT1 and OMMT1 were not used for the alignment. ITMY and SR3 was also not often used.
- For O4, ISS setup will be removed from IMMT1T table but IMMT1 oplev setup will remain.
Fiber noise cancellation improvement plans for ALS JGW-T2112769 (Tanioka)
- The end mirror for the reference path drifts too much
- Will be replaced
- Resonant peaks of PZT limits the control bandwidth
- PZT actuation range is small for long-term stability
- Use woofer and tweeter configuration
- 45 deg incidence on PZT mirror gives coupling to alignment
- Use AOM instead (in long term upgrade)
- 0 deg incidence and put waist on the mirror
- Change in the optical layout necessary
- Use PBS to minimize the change in the optical layout?
- The end mirror for the reference path drifts too much
- Report from the site
- IMC ASC simulation work started
- Layout modifications of IMC optical tables started
Agenda
Summary of interferometer alignment in O3GK and RSE commissioning JGW-T2112594 (Michimura)
- Discussion on how to proceed for O4
- Are we going to remove ISS setup at IMMT1T?
- Any upgrades necessary for IMC ASC?
- Can we automate the beam centering with Tcams for reproducibility?
- Any thoughts on why PRMI alignment has to be done before Yarm alignment?
- Are there better ways for daily alignment?
- What are the steps necessary for engaging WFS/QPD loops in O4?
- Other recent topics related to ISC
Fiber noise cancellation improvement plans for ALS JGW-T2112769 (Tanioka)
Non-polarized beam splitter https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=10506 [Michimura]
- IMC REFL: Thorlabs BSW11 are used (Ts=~40%)
- IMC TRANS: Probably Thorlabs BSW11 are used
- REFL: Note that p-pol is coming out from the chamber. Newport 10Q20HBS.33S (for s-pol) are used. Thin film polarizers are also used and there seems to be a confusion.
- POP: Newport 10Q20HBS.33S (for s-pol) is used. S-pol/P-pol power ratio can be confused with this BS.
- POS: No BS placed.
- AS: p-pol is coming out from the chamber. We agreed to use HWP to make them s-pol and to use Newport 10Q20HBS.33S (for s-pol). But this solution might be confusing.
- Planning to order non-polarized BS soon.
In-vac steering mirrors: https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=12592 [Michimura]
- For some steering mirrors, p-pol beam
- STM1, STM2, POM1, POM2 around IFI (PYD-20 is used)
- steering mirrors after OFI
- PYD-20 has a transmission
T < 70ppm at 0 deg for s-pol (measured)
T < 25ppm at 30 deg for s-pol (measured)
T < 5ppm at 45 deg for s-pol (measured)
- T ~ 1000pppm at 45 deg for p-pol (specsheet)
- Also, specs of POP_POM and POS_POM for IR p-pol needs to be investigated
- For some steering mirrors, p-pol beam
Optical table cover for TRX/TRY and IMC REFL/IMC TRANS: Review page [Michimura]